New Report: 32 States Have Introduced Immigration Enforcement Legislation, California Racing in Opposite Direction

Joe's picture

By Joe Guzzardi

Joe is a CAPS Senior Writing Fellow whose commentaries about California's social issues have run in newspapers throughout California and the country for nearly 30 years. Contact Joe at joeguzzardi@capsweb.org, or find him on Twitter @joeguzzardi19.

The writer's views are his own.

June 14, 2017
Text of Sanctuary State with map of CA crowded with people
More than 60 percent of states awakening to sanctuary dangers.

A new report from the pro-immigration Migratory Policy Institute (MPI) found that as of May 8, 2017, 32 states had introduced immigration enforcement legislation, and 24 states are considering anti-sanctuary bills, with four states having passed restrictive bills during their 2017 legislative sessions.

For example, Georgia and Indiana enacted laws restricting postsecondary institutions from adopting sanctuary campus policies. Mississippi prohibited local jurisdictions as well as postsecondary institutions from adopting or maintaining sanctuary policies.

MPI concentrated most of its research on the possible legal consequences of Texas’ anti-sanctuary SB 4 which Gov. Greg Abbott recently signed into law, and which will take effect on September 1. Three lawsuits have already been filed against SB 4, and MPI predicts similar challenges to other states laws, assuming they pass.

But encouragingly, MPI acknowledges that with President Trump’s election, “there’s an altered legal reality.” The Obama administration challenged Arizona’s 2011 SB 1070, which has some similarities to SB 4. But it’s unlikely that the Trump administration will sue against states whose objective is to strictly enforce existing immigration laws. As a result, private parties or advocacy groups would have to bring cases. MPI describes the new political climate on immigration enforcement as “hardened.” 

California isn’t among the states MPI included in those contemplating anti-sanctuary bills. In fact, California is at the complete other end of the spectrum as it proposes through its SB 54 that the entire state become a sanctuary. In its 2016 analysis, MPI wrote that since 2001, California had passed various bills that expanded entitlement to illegal aliens, including an option to pay in-state tuition, get driver’s licenses, and provide expanded Medi-Cal coverage for aliens’ minor children.

Watch the CAPS ad that discusses sanctuary California’s risk here, and read the related press release here. Then go to the CAPS Action Alert page here to tell your California Assemblyman to reject SB 54, the legislation that would make California officially a sanctuary state.
 

Categories: 

CAPS blog posts may be republished or reposted only in their entirety. Please credit CAPS as www.capsweb.org. CAPS assumes no responsibility for where blog posts might be republished or reposted. Views expressed in CAPS blog posts do not necessarily reflect the official position of CAPS.

Top